Ok. Stop here. First, a little nit: Of COURSE freer thinking requires an epistemic shift. sigh. Next, Influence only relocates in English. It does not relocate in Masri. In Masri, a new influence shows up and we notice that it’s shown up and we observe – active point here is that we OBSERVE – we don’t wait, we don’t ignore, we OBSERVE and frequently participate in what happens next.
So This: Household → Church/Temple → State → School → Market → Media → Network systems is an English level of abstraction bordering on bullshit. These, like Fauconnier and Turner showed so elegantly, become blends of the different strands as they proceed through history.
Unless you’re in a movie, power doesn’t shift from the Church on Monday to the State on Tuesday while you were sleeping.
And when things are “perceived” through an academic lens to have relocated is when there is sufficient evidence to withstand attacks. Which means by the Marketing insight of adoption means that the perception occurs at no less than 40% of the lifetime of the phenomenon. I see that you said: Monopoly. That is an English, heavily US, interest. It is also constrained by the Epistemology of the English (US) language. Yeah?
So please do this over. The first one isn’t useful because it uses English Epistemology instead of Masri Epistemology. Thank you very much.
Got it. Re-doing it in Masri epistemology: no “relocation,” no discrete handoff fantasy, no monopoly talk. We track ظهور / emergence, ملاحظة / observation, مشاركة / participation, and مزج / blending of strands over long durations. We only call something “dominant” when it is visible in practice (institutionalized, routinized, defended), not when academics decide it “shifted.”
Working frame (Masri)
- New influence يظهر (shows up)
- People يلحظوه (notice/observe)
- People يجربوه / يتعاملوا معاه (try it / deal with it)
- It يدخل في الموجود (enters what already exists)
- It يعمل مزج (blends) with prior strands
- Over generations, it may يتثبت (stabilize) into “normal”
- Old strands don’t “move.” They تفضل موجودة (remain present), sometimes reduced, sometimes intensified, sometimes re-activated.
Timeline of key appearances and blends (post ~10,000 BCE)
1) ~10,000–3000 BCE — Agriculture as baseline strand
What يظهر: settled land, storage, inheritance, household-as-production
Observation: daily life becomes structured by seasonality + property continuity
Blend outcome: elder value is anchored in land memory + household authority (not “information” in abstract)
2) ~3300–2000 BCE — External memory appears (writing + accounting)
What يظهر: record-keeping (grain, tax, debt), written contracts, legal memory outside persons
Observation: people learn that “the tablet remembers” even when the elder is gone
Blend outcome: elders remain socially central, but memory authority becomes shareable with scribes and archives
(so: elder authority persists, but a parallel memory channel appears)
3) ~2000–500 BCE — Formalized law + administrated hierarchy thickens
What يظهر: codified legal systems, state taxation, bureaucracy
Observation: obligations become enforceable by entities beyond kin
Blend outcome: “family duty” becomes partly state-legible; kin norms are reinforced by legal scaffolding, not replaced
4) ~800–200 BCE — Axial moral systems appear and interpenetrate
What يظهر: durable moral vocabularies that travel (Greek ethics, Confucian duty, prophetic traditions, etc.)
Observation: people use new moral language to justify old practices and to argue against them
Blend outcome: elder care becomes not just practical but justifiable as virtue, piety, order, etc.
(Not “the Church replaces the household.” Rather: a moral-justification layer thickens.)
5) ~300–1200 CE — Institutional charity emerges as a supplementary channel
What يظهر: hospitals, endowments, monasteries, waqf systems, almshouses
Observation: some non-kin care becomes possible in cities and religious centers
Blend outcome: family obligation remains primary, but exceptions become sustainable (especially for the poor, widows, the unattached)
6) ~1450–1700 — Print + mass literacy begins (slow, uneven)
What يظهر: cheap replication of text; vernacular reading; competing authorities
Observation: you can hear another voice without leaving your village
Blend outcome: elders lose exclusive control of narrative; new claims arrive through text and begin blending with household norms
7) ~1760–1900 — Wage labor + urban migration (industrial strand) thickens
What يظهر: cash wages, factories, cities, geographic separation
Observation: young adults can survive without land + household
Blend outcome: elder authority weakens because proximity weakens, not because “youth get enlightened.”
Household strand remains, but now competes with employer time, urban anonymity, rent economics.
8) 1889–1965 — Social insurance appears (pensions + health systems)
Key dates (anchors):
- 1889 Germany old-age insurance (first major national system)
- 1908 UK old-age pensions
- 1935 US Social Security
- 1948 UK NHS
- 1965 US Medicare/Medicaid
What يظهر: old people can receive income/medical care not mediated by children
Observation: the “intergenerational contract” becomes optional in practice for more households
Blend outcome: elder care doesn’t vanish; it is re-parameterized:
- Children’s support becomes supplement or choice rather than the only lifeline
- “Duty” becomes negotiable because failure no longer guarantees visible death
This is a major episteme inflection because survival becomes more system-mediated.
9) ~1870–1950 (overlapping) — Compulsory schooling appears as a daily shaper
What يظهر: standardized curriculum, age-grading, national language norms
Observation: kids spend large parts of the day inside an institution with its own epistemic template
Blend outcome: household narrative becomes one voice among several; children learn to “answer to” a non-kin authority routinely
Again: not a shift Tuesday-to-Wednesday. A slow thickening.
10) ~1920–1990 — Broadcast media strand thickens
What يظهر: radio/film/TV producing shared imaginaries
Observation: authority becomes audible/visible at scale; norms are demonstrated, repeated, made “obvious”
Blend outcome: elders can’t gate what youth see; household becomes permeable
(But elders sometimes reassert through media—so it’s a blend, not replacement.)
11) ~1990–present — Network systems + algorithmic environments
What يظهر: search, social feeds, peer swarms, rapid memetic mutation
Observation: people see new norms emerge in real time; participation is immediate
Blend outcome: authority becomes multi-sited; age as authority marker is less reliable because competence becomes domain-specific and rapidly updated
Your adoption-curve point (40% of lifetime)
Agreed as a constraint: “perceived dominance” lags.
So in this frame:
- appearance date = when strand begins functioning
- perceived-as-normal date = when it’s routinized enough to survive attacks
- dominance claims must be dated later than first appearance
Example:
Its “normalization” (in daily epistemic shaping) is later (2000s–2010s), varying by class and region.
Internet appears as infrastructure in the 1990s
Where multigenerational living fits (without “relocation”)
Multigenerational living isn’t a strand that “moves.” It is a coupling mechanism that increases the weight of household templates.
As it declines (historically: urban/industrial contexts, 19th–20th c.), three couplers weaken:
- co-presence (daily exposure)
- economic entanglement
- monitoring/shame network density
When those weaken, other strands become more actionable—not because elders “lost value,” but because the couplers changed.
Minimal restatement of your thesis in this frame
Safe to say:
“Freer thinking” is the experience of having multiple live templates in play, not a clean liberation event.
As co-residence decreased (esp. 1760–1950 depending on place), the household’s capacity to enforce its template weakened.
New strands (wage labor, schooling, pensions, media, networks) appeared, were observed, and blended into daily life.
Leave a Reply